Dale Shultz "Wetlands Deregulation Bill Passed Under False Pretenses" 01.22.13

Read this article on Line

Wetlands Deregulation Bill Passed Under False Pretenses

January 22, 2013    by Rebecca Kemble

Sen. Dale Schultz (R-Richland Center) at a joint press conference with Sen. Tim Cullen (D-Janesville) unveiling an alternative mining bill on January 22, 2013.

At a press conference unveiling Sen. Tim Cullen’s (D-Janesville) alternative mining bill today, Sen. Dale Schultz (R-Richland Center) said the controversial wetlands deregulation bill he helped craft last year only passed because of assurances by Scott Walker’s administration and the Department of Natural Resources that the provisions in it would only apply to small scale real estate development projects and would not be incorporated into a mining bill.

“Throughout the process we heard that this is not a backdoor mining bill,” said Schultz. He described meetings in which DNR Deputy Secretary Matt Moroney downplayed concerns from the Wisconsin Wetlands Association, tribal leaders and the Wisconsin Wildlife Foundation that removing the “Areas of Special Natural Resource Interest” designation for fragile wetlands and setting up wetlands “mitigation banks” would ease the way for a large scale mining project in the pristine, water rich environment of the Penokee Hills on the shores of Lake Superior.

Schultz quoted  a 2011 Wisconsin State Journal article in which Walker spokesman Cullen Werwie responded to the allegation that the wetlands bill was a back-door attempt to promote mining by saying, “That is a flat-out lie. This has nothing to do with mining. It is part of an overall DNR reform package that has been planned since January.”

But last session’s AB 426, and now SB1/AB1, the mining bill promoted by Sen. Tom Tiffany (R-Hazelhurst) and Rep. Scott Suder (R-Abbotsford), incorporate all of the most controversial elements of the wetlands bill, including allowing a mining company to fill in lakes, streams and wetlands with potentially toxic mining waste.

Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce downplayed the significance of that provision, calling those waterways “puddles.”  In response, Sen. Schultz said, “I’m not familiar with any statutory definition of puddles.”

The Tyler Forks, one of the “puddles” that could be filled in by mining waste.

In describing the ecosystem of the proposed mining site, Schultz added, “This is arguably Wisconsin’s most pristine watershed.  It is an enormously important source of water to the Bad River. The Kakagon Sloughs are called the “everglades of the north.” The Bad River tribe said their standard is seven generations, and this puts at risk what is important economically and also what is sacred to them.”

When asked if he would have worked on and voted for the wetlands bill had he known it would be used as part of the mining proposal, Schultz said, “Absolutely not.” He added, “Trust was absolutely abused. Everyone else who relied on those assurances would more than likely feel the same way. The fact that some people raised this issue in advance is probably validation of that very fact. They have been misled.  Whether that was intentional or not – I can easily see how people would feel that way because I feel that way.”